Monthly Archives: November 2011

Warrantless Search and Your Right to Privacy

Today David Michael Cantor

, Phoenix, Arizona DUI lawyer, speaks of a case recently heard in the U.S. Supreme Court records without a warrant. At stake is the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States in the search and called the exception of emergencies. The hearing revolves around a case of Kentucky, where police chased a suspect who had just sold drugs to an undercover officer and fled. The officers followed the suspect in a building and began to suspect an apartment where the smell of marijuana was present. After knocking and announcing their presence as police officers creaked and movement inside the apartment. Fearing that the evidence was destroyed the officers broke down the door and instead of finding their suspect found Hollis King and friends smoke marijuana. King was arrested and sentenced 11 years in prison. Fourth Amendment, U.S. Constitution protects citizens against unreasonable searches. Normally a police officer to enter private property to be issued a court order. An exception is for “emergency situations” where an officer suspects that a crime is committed and someone’s life is at stake, the criminal can escape, or in this case, evidence may be destroyed. The problem here, as David Michael Cantor, he says, is that the officers created the exigent circumstances by knocking
Video Note: 5 / 5

Arizona DUI and criminal

Video Note: 0 / 5

San Francisco DUI Attorney of the Fitch Law Offices Announces They?re Offering One Free Half Hour Consultation to Help DUI Offenders

San Francisco DUI Attorney of the Fitch Law Offices Announces They’re Offering One Free Half Hour Consultation to Help DUI Offenders

The Fitch Law Office is offering one free half hour consultation

San Francisco, CA (PRWEB) November 30, 2011

It’s a given that people are more likely to be in a drunk-induced accident during the holidays. San Francisco DUI Attorney of the Fitch Law Office would like to emphatically state that driving while drunk is the stupidest thing a person can do. However, for those who have unthinkingly stepped into the car while drunk or indulged in indecent public displays, and been caught, there is help at the Fitch Law Offices. One free consultation, lasting half an hour – knocking off $ 150 from any further fees – is being offered to help those in need of counsel over DUI charges. These consultations might be the only thing standing between a slightly tarnished reputation and a completely ruined life. The offer lasts until December 31st, 2011.

“Please be safe for the holidays and avoid drinking and driving, but if you find yourself in any trouble you can contact the Fitch Law Office,” says Angeli Fitch, criminal lawyer of the Fitch Law Office.

To avoid landing in trouble and needing these services in the first place, parties should always designate at least one person who will not drink, so that they can drive the group back home. If the person is alone, either call a friend, a cab, or stay the night. Thirdly, partiers should not over-indulge; it is the surest way to prevent accidents.

For more information, please call (415) 240-4435 or visit them online at

About Fitch Law Offices

San Francisco personal injury attorney of the Fitch Law Office serves the entire Bay Area. Areas of expertise are in the fields of Marijuana Law and Defense Litigation, Personal Injury Civil Litigation, Criminal Defense Litigation and Financial Elder Abuse and Elder Rights Civil Litigation. Their mission is to protect a person’s legal rights and helping them understand the complexities of the legal system.

“We will fight for your freedom and be compassionate with your situation.”

# # #

Vocus©Copyright 1997-

, Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.
Vocus, PRWeb, and Publicity Wire are trademarks or registered trademarks of Vocus, Inc. or Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.

Hartline Dacus Attorneys Defend Restaurant in Discrimination Case and Win Unanimous Jury Verdict

Hartline Dacus Attorneys Defend Restaurant in Discrimination Case and Win Unanimous Jury Verdict

Dallas, TX (PRWEB) July 11, 2011

Hartline Dacus Barger Dreyer LLP today announced a unanimous jury verdict in defense of Texas Roadhouse, a national restaurant company. A former employee accused the restaurant company of discrimination based on his religious beliefs, according to court documents. He claimed the management of the Corpus Christi, Texas Roadhouse had forced him to work on Sundays in violation of his religious beliefs. He sued for reinstatement, back pay, mental anguish damages and attorney’s fees.

“Texas Roadhouse has been committed to the well-being of its employees since opening the first restaurant in 1993. The company has a culture that values and appreciates each team member, and it was clear to us that this former employee had no real basis for his claims of discrimination,” said Albert Holl, an attorney with the Corpus Christi office of Hartline Dacus Barger Dreyer LLP.

Court documents show that the former employee claimed he had put the Texas Roadhouse on notice of his beliefs at the time of hire and that the restaurant agreed to accommodate him by never scheduling him to work on Sundays. Texas Roadhouse representatives disputed this statement and acknowledged that while this former employee was routinely scheduled off on Sundays and Mondays, Texas Roadhouse required all employees to work on Mother’s Day and Father’s Day, two of the restaurant’s highest-volume days of the year. The plaintiff claimed that after agreeing to work three previous holiday Sundays out of fear of losing his job, he refused to come to work for a scheduled shift on Father’s Day of 2008 and was fired for it. Texas Roadhouse countered that on all of the holidays at issue, the plaintiff agreed to come to work and was even permitted to come in later than scheduled to attend services at his church.

The Court instructed the jury to consider three questions before getting to damages: 1) Was the plaintiff terminated? 2) If so, was religion a motivating factor in the decision to fire him? 3) Even if his religious beliefs were a motivating factor, was there an undue hardship defense that would relieve the defendant from being required to accommodate those religious beliefs?

During the course of investigating the case, attorneys Albert Holl and Rick Waterhouse of Hartline Dacus Barger Dreyer LLP were able to uncover admissible information concerning the plaintiff’s spotty employment history, according to court records. This information was critical in undermining the plaintiff’s credibility during the trial. The defense called Texas Roadhouse management and several employees to rebut the plaintiff’s claims and was able to introduce key documents supporting the defense position that the plaintiff had abandoned his job and was not terminated.

Following a three-day trial in Nueces County, Texas, the jury of one man and five women returned a complete defense verdict on June 22, 2011.

Hartline Dacus Barger Dreyer LLP is a Texas-based litigation firm with offices in Dallas, Corpus Christi, and Houston. The firm’s 33 attorneys pride themselves on providing uncompromising excellence to their clients in a variety of litigation areas, including product liability, commercial litigation, class action and multidistrict litigation, intellectual property, personal injury defense, premises liability, labor and employment, insurance coverage, healthcare, construction and dealer/franchise litigation. For more information about Hartline Dacus Barger Dreyer LLP, visit

Based in Louisville, Kentucky, Texas Roadhouse opened its doors in 1993. In just 18 years, Texas Roadhouse has grown to more than 330 locations in 46 states. The company is famous for hand-cut steaks, made-from-scratch sides, fresh-baked bread, and its lively atmosphere. In 2007 and 2008 Forbes magazine ranked the company as one of the 200 Best Small Companies and in 2009 the company was ranked “Best Value” by readers of Consumer Reports magazine. For more information, visit

SOURCE: Hartline Dacus Barger Dreyer LLP

Cause Number: 10-61195-4

Court: County Court at Law No. 4 in Nueces County, Texas



Vocus©Copyright 1997-

, Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.
Vocus, PRWeb, and Publicity Wire are trademarks or registered trademarks of Vocus, Inc. or Vocus PRW Holdings, LLC.

1 2 3 275